1.16.2013

East of Eden, Steinbeck- B+

                                         Thank you, Lauren, for this gift of literature on my birthday. I look forward to many more.  For me the distinction between  fiction and literature is the author's ability to wordsmith. The classics' authors that I think highly of, write in such a way that I marvel at their words. And here Steinbeck is in the same league as Dickens and Hemingway. The places are seeable and the characters so well-defined.  Since I much prefer the great storytellers, like Michener, Uris or LeCarre, when I come across classic writing, I slow down to take it in. After all, finding out what happens is not the point.
                                         Now as to what happens, that gets complicated for me because I do not see to the depth of the scholars or even students of the tale.   In the last paragraph of Chapter 34, Steinbeck says:  "We have only one story. All novels, all poetry are built on the never-ending contest in ourselves of good and evil. And it occurs to me that evil must constantly respawn, while good, while virtue is immortal. Vice has a new fresh young face, while virtue is venerable as nothing else in the world."
                                         Although this novel spends a great deal of time on the story of the Hamiltons, all the complexity and the main story is that of the Trasks. Adam and Charles have a tortured relationship with their father,  Cyrus, a mean lying cheat.  Cyrus' stolen fortune, however, allows both, particulary Adam,  to make his life choices.  His most fateful  choice is to love Cathy, a woman so depraved (certainly by mid-century American standards) that she shoots her husband, walks out on her twin sons and turns to running a house of ill-repute as her vocation.  Both sons love Adam, but the tension between Adam and Cal is a constant strain. Whereas, Aron can do no wrong. Cal tells Aron of their mother's circumstance, driving Aron to a move of despertion, enlistment in the Army. His death causes Adam's stroke, leaving Cal devastated by the consequences to his family of his actions. His father forgives him.
                                      So ends what the introduction calls "Steinbeck's other big book."  Grapes of Wrath was rejected by mainstream America because it was an indictment of the system.  This was rejected because of Cathy's brazen sexuality.  Both stand as masterpieces.
                                     

5 comments:


  1. That was fast! I am so glad you liked it! It's a great book. I really enjoyed the play between Steinbeck's tales and the original story of Cain and Abel; it was fun to try to anticipate what might happen based on the biblical tale.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Love you, Lal. Blog posting probably won't coincide with actual completion dates. My Editor is busy and not always on my schedule.

      Delete
  2. Even though I can chalk up this and Grapes of Wrath as read and enjoyed, I am absolutely dreadful on the great American novelists. If I read anything by Faulkner, I don't remember it. Hemingway either. How can I spend 20 years in school and be able to make that comment. Maybe that should be my retirement task. By the way, as much as I avoided the great mid century novelists, I would also avoid the great James Deans movie version. It only looks at the last third of the book. ABC did a very creditable mini series of this back in the early 80's

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Will. Thanks for tip on movie. I was going to watch it tonight. Think I'll pass. The Catholic Schools were light on literature. Let's face it. They wouldn't do this or just about anything else that Lauren teaches. I've not read Catcher in the Rye. I remember doing Shakespeare at Molloy - the sexual references get lost in the old language. I remember doing Dickens at Marist - Bleak House is tame. They specialized in grammar and spelling. I seem though to have been asleep for punctuation - particularly apostrophes. Whenever I see a list of the greatest novels of all time, I've read about 5%. Not so sure about spending your retirement reading Moby Dick.

      Delete
    2. Well good work fixing it. I think my James Dean remarks got truncated. To be honest I never really got him, the movies (to me) ranged from awful( Rebel...) to great (giant). Too bad you missed Catcher in the Rye. I think we re way too old , but it was a perfect book to read at 15-16. If you never the Updike Rabbit series, it might up the 5 percent to 6

      Delete